
Ten months ago an AI told me I couldn't build my own diet app. It was right about the project I described. Seven weeks of evenings later, a database, a cron job and Claude on my phone replaced three subscriptions.

Anthropic open-sourced the skill behind Claude for Teachers, so this time I could read it instead of guessing. Third verdict of the series: what sits underneath each tool runs in a different direction.

Somebody decided what the right answer was. By the time it reaches you, it looks like the world.

I built a Socratic TOK bot that refuses to do students' work, with Nicolas Cage as the failsafe. Three months and 2,600 messages later, here's every way it leaked.

I turn what I say out loud while reading a student's essay into margin comments in their Word document. First verdict of the promised series: Claude for Teachers missed this one.

Anthropic just launched Claude for Teachers. I've spent eighteen months building most of it by hand—so I can say which half of the product helps teachers and which half quietly replaces them.

A dog-poop tracker, a voice clone for dad jokes, and my great-grandfather's wartime photographs. Fluency with AI is built on the useless projects—not the necessary ones.

I ran discourse analysis on ten of my own lessons. The real work wasn't the recording or the coding—it was catching the machine every time it lied.

My jiu-jitsu coach taught what he was still learning, and said so out loud. That turned out to be the better way to lead a room into AI.

The real measure of AI isn't what you use it for—it's what you stop doing because of it.

Five ways a TOK essay looks right and reads wrong—and the one move that fixes all of them.

A recursive diagnostic interview I ran on myself — the technique I failed to use when I needed it most. Something of Ted Chiang's Exhalation in it.

I recorded 30 of my lessons and asked AI to tell me if I'm any good. 176,000 words of transcript, 702 questions coded, and findings I never would have spotted on my own.

I used AI to build a high-stakes workshop — and fell apart delivering it. What I learned about the difference between AI as safety net versus AI as substitute.

How AI helped me rebuild a TOK lesson on disadvantage — turning Jonathan Wolff's decathlon model into an interactive web tool with 13 sliders and 9 real-world communities.

Practical guidelines for using AI as a learning scaffold, not a crutch. Research-backed strategies for mastery approach vs completion approach.

AI is a cognitive multiplier - but what you multiply matters more than the multiplier. Why sequence matters: building foundations before amplifying them.

Schools try to detect AI. Students try to evade. Both are trapped in Vizzini's circular reasoning. Here's how to step outside the game entirely...

Open any subject guide and flip to the grade descriptors for a 7. The word "evaluate" shows up every time. Here is what that means for your teaching...